[SOLVED] libpango and libcanberra-gtk3 removed

[bertaerts]

With the updates of a few minutes ago, some i586 packages on my Mageia 5 beta 3 x86_64, with all updates installed, were removed to be able to update.

But now Texas Instruments Code Composer Studio v5.5 no longer starts, it needs
libpango
libcanberra-gtk3

These packages appear in Mageia Control Center Software Management but can not be installed:
"Sorry, the following package can not be selected" without any further explanation...

What is going on so close to release of Mageia 5 ?
And how can I solve it ?

[bertaerts]

If I copy the file libcanberra-gtk0-0.30-7.mga5.i586.rpm from the repo on my disk and try to install it, I get:
cannot be installed due to unsatisfied libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
Which rpm is delivering this library?

[jkerr82508]

Have you enabled all of the necessary on-line repositories?
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Installing_a ... rrectly.3F

What does:

Code: Select all

urpmq --list-media active

report?

Jim

[bertaerts]

Code: Select all

[bert@Dell7720Mageia5usb ~]$ urpmq --list-media active
Core Release (distrib1)
Core Updates (distrib3)
Nonfree Release (distrib11)
Nonfree Updates (distrib13)
Tainted Release (distrib21)
Tainted Updates (distrib23)
Core 32bit Release (distrib31)
Core 32bit Updates (distrib32)
Nonfree 32bit Release (distrib36)
Nonfree 32bit Updates (distrib37)
Tainted 32bit Release (distrib41)
Tainted 32bit Updates (distrib42)
Google Chrome


[jkerr82508]

Note that libcanberra-gtk0 is not the same as libcanberra-gtk3_0.

To find the package that provides libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0

Code: Select all

$ urpmf libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
lib64gtk+-x11-2.0_0:/usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
lib64gtk+-x11-2.0_0:/usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.26
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0:/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
libgtk+-x11-2.0_0:/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0.2400.26

(If the TI software is 64 bit then you probably need lib64xxx packages and not libxxx packages.)

When rpmdrake fails to install a package, installing using urpmi in a terminal may give a more verbose explanation of why it does not install.

Jim

[bertaerts]

One day later missing i586 rpm's could be installed again.
I do not know why that was impossible yesterdag...