by wobo » Feb 20th, '12, 14:15
Well, at some points (like after partitioning or after installing packages) a step back is certainly not possible but it may be possible after other steps - and there you have the back button in the installer.
Of course this is related to the overall structure of the installation process. There are distributions where all questions are asked before partiioning and before installing packages - configuration is saved in RAM. Only after all the config questions are answered the "non-revertible" steps are started. You could compare it with compiling a kernel, all configuration steps are made in the beginning, resulting in a makefile with chances to jump back at all times. Only after this Makefile is written the real "making" starts. In other words: to make a reasonable "back button" system possible, the whole installation process must be changed. If we had the manpower to do that I would certainly vote for this change.
Concerning graphics: I agree to the need for a more modern look of the installer - IMHO just changing to oxygen-gtk is not sufficient. Again we would need some more manpower - this time in the artwork team to create something different. OTOH the installer is something you use once (not counting first time experience where you may do 20 installations during the first month) and then forget about it for 9 months. So top priority should be on ease of use of the installer (which also means good included help (see F1 button)), looks only on second position.
wobo
---
And a new day will dawn for those who stand long
And the forests will echo with laughter
(Stairway to Heaven, Led Zeppelin)