viking60 wrote:Why is this marked solved? (I cannot find any tips and Tricks section.)
by doktor5000 » Jun 29th, '12, 23:09
Maybe just look some threads further down? viewtopic.php?f=18&t=2772
Two plus weeks later and still nothing.isadora wrote:There still is no "Tips and Tricks" (or whatever name it is going to be)-section.
Waiting is for admin, i will give him a push.
- doktor5000 will go through previous requests and posted issues in forums and forums-discuss ml and collect those on one wiki page, so they can be revisited/revalidated and prioritized
viking60 wrote:Well if the information is good then why has it been altered in the moving process?
Requests older than one year must be regarded as "Will not implement" by active ignoration, and demand an explanation according to the Code of Conduct
Sorry my mistake I was assuming that you did itdoktor5000 wrote:viking60 wrote:Well if the information is good then why has it been altered in the moving process?
Huh? I've just copy-pasted the contents of your wiki page into the existing one. Maat seems to have edited the table: https://wiki.mageia.org/mw-en/index.php ... oldid=9602 You can see via the history of that page: https://wiki.mageia.org/mw-en/index.php ... on=history
doktor5000 wrote:For the rest, just complaining does not help, it does not help to get the issues fixed earlier, and it does not help f.ex. to find a PHP hacker faster to help maat do the things which were requested, as he is quite busy with his dayjob. Surely it's not a nice situation and that some requests that were done in forums are open for more than a year. But just by requesting something you can't expect that this will get implemented. It needs to be discussed in what priority and if those requests can be satisfied. And please be patient as forums teams has just been newly formed.
doktor5000 wrote:Apart from that, accusing me or someone directly is not the proper way to get things done.
Also the last sentence on your pageRequests older than one year must be regarded as "Will not implement" by active ignoration, and demand an explanation according to the Code of Conduct
is quite accusing and not really nice,.
viking60 wrote:I have offered to fix the BBC-code within an hour if I get the admin rights
viking60 wrote:Result: There will be no spoilers until I change status from contributing member to paying customer.= never.
viking60 wrote:Result: There will be no spoilers until I change status from contributing member to paying customer.= never.
wobo wrote:Looking at the list in the forum I can see no meaningful system there.
It is not a bug. When the forums were implemented the sysadmin in charge expected more localized forums here, so he started with a setup where all software maintenance is done centralized. Unfortunately this turned out as a hurdle instead of an advantage (my personal opinion).viking60 wrote:This might very well be a structural bug. I agree with you there Wobo.
LOL! Who are you to think that I should prove anything to you? If anything, this I don't need any more.So go ahead and prove me wrong.
This sentence only proves that you have no clue what you are talking about. And it does not belong here anyway.It might have felt good to get that Mandriva story of your chest so why ruin a good story with the truth right?
Here it always talk about joining some group with no clear concept of what to do next. Mainly because the groups do not have the rights to accomplish anything? (even if the people would be able to - I will admit it ).
Also I must admit that since this setup is so super special as you never fail to mention, that I would not know how to deal with it.
Obviously that does not only go for me ....
Don't take this out of context. This was about the groups and permissions. First: this is just my personal opinion which is not shared by everybody. Secondary: the forum team is about to get this done, they already started to clean out the list.wobo wrote:Looking at the list in the forum I can see no meaningful system there.
[/quote] About the spoiler that's my personal opinion. I don't count the number of people against it, to me (and the people who have to do that) the relevant number is the number of people who request it. As for "Open links in a new tab" I am all in. This is one thing which also annoys me once or twice a year when I forgot to use the middle button. But keeping away just because of this... what a pathetic move. Perhaps they are not much interested in the contents and help of the forum but rather in its background color or whatever.Regarding the spoiler that you are against - what harm would it do to you? You are not forced to use it. It would only add flexibility to the forum.
And more people have expressed their support for a spoiler than against, even if you repeat yourself it only counts as one vote
But if we leave spoilers out of it - what about the link in new tab/window it really annoys me too?
Please do not give me the middle click work around speech - it still annoys me. AFAICT members are keeping away because of it.
viking60 wrote:Doktor 5000 does not have all the rights he should have to accomplish what he wants done and you did not have it .
You both have complained about it in the past - what has changed?
So musste ich im Bugzilla anfragen, misc musste maat fragen, maat hat misc gesagt, dass er das template ändern muss und misc wiederum durfte mir das dann im Bugzilla übermitteln! Zeit von 3 Leuten verschwendet.
Aber anscheinend hat man (wer wohl?) Angst, ich könnte da Sachen verändern, die (wem?) nicht gefallen würden.
viking60 wrote:Only I did offer to implement all BBC codes......I did make the wiki page that Doctor 5000 "should" have done....It was deleted hours later altered and integrated with another page.with altered content to make the reactive (as in not pro-active) people look better.
doktor5000 wrote:...... And two of the points you have put up that list were requested by me.
Return to Discussions about forums
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest