doktor5000 wrote: it's permitted in France, and even obligatory if the user demands it (to be able to remove anything he posted), so i was told by Romain.
wobo wrote:For normal reasons I'd prefer not to erase any posts as written in the previous post. But it's not my decision at all, only my opinion.
pmithrandir wrote:In the section :
- You can delete your post if nobody answered it.
- You can't remove the post if there is an anwser
- You can edit your post all the time.
In help section :
- You can't delete the post if somebody answered it
- You can't delete a post if nobody answered it
- You can edit you post when you want.
and to be able to delete my post if I found them stupid after 25 seconds.(You know when the process of explaining the problem give you the obvious answer ruight after clicking on the "Submit" button.
Who decides whether it looks stupid or not? Even if you find the solution is obvious, there may be another user who does not see this
BTW: My question "Who decides whether it looks stupid or not?" was a rethoric question, in case you did not see that. The answer is obvious: nobody, because there is no such thing as a stupid post
viking60 wrote:In the (extremely unlikely?) case that the poster might disagree with you here; he should have the right to follow his mind.
That's how tolerant I am
I think there can be exceptions on certain forums though - but it holds water as a main rule (so maybe we agree).
viking60 wrote:Well the right to activate a site admin or a moderator can be more of a "Beschäftigungsterapie" (Activation therapy) .
If you have the right but not the permission then it is not worth much - and it does not make much sense.
wobo wrote:You don't seem to understand.
See, if the user insists on removing the post there is nothing the Global Moderators can do against doing what the user wants.
- it is not "mistrusting the user" because the Global Moderators have no power to override the user's decision
- it is not "controlling the community" because controlling needs power which the Global Moderators not have wrt this issue.
wobo wrote:But what exceptions do you mean? What difference does it make in which section I am wrt my right on my intellectual property? You can't have both, pointing at the right on intellectual property and at the same time talk about exceptions.
Return to Discussions about forums
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest