Incorrect sha512sum Mageia6.1 Xfce 64-bit
Posted: Oct 10th, '18, 08:25
Hi folks not exactly in need of advanced support myself, but perhaps you can fast-track me to whom to report this to?
I was at DistroWatch, as I often am (I run about 80 Distros), and downloaded the Xfce 64-bit of Mageia 6.1 (I have 6.0 on another machine, but am phasing it out).
The download went fine, but the hot link to the 512sum is bodgy, it is actually for 6.0.
As I understand it, the correct sha256 should be
834fb5085c7b1b16499c123fb46afc5cc3d31fff109a30f50a95e1b2db294671564543bf9646d677c734373d6263042a7b8dfe6fa4b5e013618693f36cffd6ab
... is that so? And that is what my download shows.
All other txt files appear to be OK, including the Xfce i586 - it is just the xfce 64-bit that is flaky.
Someone could do with contacting DistroWatch to fix.
Cheers and keep up the good work
Chris Turner
wizardfromoz
You'll usually find me at linux.org
I was at DistroWatch, as I often am (I run about 80 Distros), and downloaded the Xfce 64-bit of Mageia 6.1 (I have 6.0 on another machine, but am phasing it out).
The download went fine, but the hot link to the 512sum is bodgy, it is actually for 6.0.
As I understand it, the correct sha256 should be
834fb5085c7b1b16499c123fb46afc5cc3d31fff109a30f50a95e1b2db294671564543bf9646d677c734373d6263042a7b8dfe6fa4b5e013618693f36cffd6ab
... is that so? And that is what my download shows.
All other txt files appear to be OK, including the Xfce i586 - it is just the xfce 64-bit that is flaky.
Someone could do with contacting DistroWatch to fix.
Cheers and keep up the good work
Chris Turner
wizardfromoz
You'll usually find me at linux.org