[Solved]RAM captured by unseen process

This forum is dedicated to basic help and support :

Ask here your questions about basic installation and usage of Mageia. For example you may post here all your questions about getting Mageia isos and installing it, configuring your printer, using your word processor etc.

Try to ask your questions in the right sub-forum with as much details as you can gather. the more precise the question will be, the more likely you are to get a useful answer

[Solved]RAM captured by unseen process

Postby gaojicainiao » Dec 11th, '22, 13:25

1.png
1.png (282.1 KiB) Viewed 1655 times

2.png
2.png (160.97 KiB) Viewed 1655 times

:?:
Last edited by gaojicainiao on Dec 11th, '22, 15:38, edited 1 time in total.
gaojicainiao
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Feb 19th, '22, 16:11

Re: RAM captured by unseen process

Postby sturmvogel » Dec 11th, '22, 14:12

What's the problem? Different tools use different ways to calculate the memory usage. One is the ancient plasma tool (ksysguard) and one is the actual successor (systemmonitor).

Read the description from the column "Memory":
This is an approximation of the real amount of physical memory that this process is using. It is calculated by dividing the process' shared memory usage by the amount of processes sharing that memory, then adding the process' private memory.
sturmvogel
 
Posts: 744
Joined: Jul 30th, '12, 00:39

Re: RAM captured by unseen process

Postby gaojicainiao » Dec 11th, '22, 14:27

Oh, sorry that I did not explain accurately. I mean there are some processes, they have their own ram usage, but when sum (in picture 1), it does not match (the picture 2).
Every time I boot into desktop, it has only 1 GiB ram usage in gnome system monitor, but now I closed all other application windows, it has so much more ram that I can not seen which process is using it.
gaojicainiao
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Feb 19th, '22, 16:11

Re: RAM captured by unseen process

Postby doktor5000 » Dec 11th, '22, 15:04

For one, you are comparing apples to oranges. And for two, you should read up on the explanations what those columns actually mean.
Do you know what shared memory or RSS means related to processes, and how the total memory usage is displayed (and why that is often misunderstood)?

Also, what is your actual problem? What you've shown is just a few screenshots of two system monitors, but no actual underlying problem was presented.
Cauldron is not for the faint of heart!
Caution: Hot, bubbling magic inside. May explode or cook your kittens!
----
Disclaimer: Beware of allergic reactions in answer to unconstructive complaint-type posts
User avatar
doktor5000
 
Posts: 18080
Joined: Jun 4th, '11, 10:10
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: RAM captured by unseen process

Postby gaojicainiao » Dec 11th, '22, 15:37

Linux RAM.png
Linux RAM.png (84.28 KiB) Viewed 1634 times

Found a picture then understood suddenly.
Oh my god. I have something want to complain, but I think I would better not to say, I have no the qualification.
:shock:
I am sorry for disturbing.
gaojicainiao
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Feb 19th, '22, 16:11

Re: [Solved]RAM captured by unseen process

Postby gaojicainiao » Dec 11th, '22, 15:53

https://www.linuxatemyram.com/

Please forgive a newbie.

:oops:
gaojicainiao
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Feb 19th, '22, 16:11

Re: [Solved]RAM captured by unseen process

Postby doktor5000 » Dec 11th, '22, 17:49

That's what I tried to tell you already in your previous thread on this topic: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=14773
But you didn't seem to want to listen.
Cauldron is not for the faint of heart!
Caution: Hot, bubbling magic inside. May explode or cook your kittens!
----
Disclaimer: Beware of allergic reactions in answer to unconstructive complaint-type posts
User avatar
doktor5000
 
Posts: 18080
Joined: Jun 4th, '11, 10:10
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: [Solved]RAM captured by unseen process

Postby gaojicainiao » Dec 12th, '22, 02:19

doktor5000 wrote:That's what I tried to tell you already in your previous thread on this topic: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=14773
But you didn't seem to want to listen.


Sometimes my gnome system monitor says cache (ram) is much more than application used. So I thought the cache does not belong to the sum. But sometimes cache is a part of sum, which make me ask this question. What I need is a word "cache belongs to used ram sum". I thought the "file cache" you said belongs to free ram (in linux's view), so misunderstanding happened.

"Usually every free amount of memory is used by file caching, this is nothing that needs to be fixed." You said.
gaojicainiao
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Feb 19th, '22, 16:11

Re: [Solved]RAM captured by unseen process

Postby doktor5000 » Dec 12th, '22, 16:18

You may want to read something like Mel Gorman's book "Understanding the Linux Virtual Memory Manager": https://www.kernel.org/doc/gorman/
Cauldron is not for the faint of heart!
Caution: Hot, bubbling magic inside. May explode or cook your kittens!
----
Disclaimer: Beware of allergic reactions in answer to unconstructive complaint-type posts
User avatar
doktor5000
 
Posts: 18080
Joined: Jun 4th, '11, 10:10
Location: Leipzig, Germany


Return to Basic support

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest