wimedel wrote:I run the script on a fresh 64-bits installation and it worked perfectly well. Nevertheless I allow myself some remarks:
I wonder whether the script could not be made more efficient regarding the formulated i586 dependencies.
The list of 5 packages which I formulated in my last post, with the addition of libmesagl1 is in my eyes sufficient. In this case you download 21 i586 packages totally.
If you use lsb-lib, as the script does, there are downloaded about 110 packages, most of them useless.
Not sure how you can get around the requirement for lsb-lib. Using your list (in a clean minimal installation of mga1 LXDE) the G.E. rpm fails installation with :
error: Failed dependencies:
lsb-core-ia32 is needed by google-earth-stable-6.0.3.2197-0.i386
lsb-graphics-ia32 is needed by google-earth-stable-6.0.3.2197-0.i386
the latter requires the former, so this boils down to a require of lsb-graphics-ia32
Installing lsb-graphics-ia32 pulls around 50 packages with it (or more depending on the mail transport agent chosen) including lsb-lib, so I am puzzled as to how you managed to install G.E. with only 25 packages.
The need of libmesagl1 depends on the video driver which is used.
For instance, my experience is that you need this package when you use the opensource nv-driver for a Nvidia video-chipset. When you use the proprietary videodriver of Nvidia libmesagl1 is not needed. I guess that this is also the case when you use other firmware video drivers.
Handy to know - I found it segfaulted at launch on nouveau with my hardware but works fine with nvidia (I didn't try nv)
The creating of the link ld-lsb.so.3 to ld-linux.so.2 is not necessary if you install libglibc_lsb. This package creates this link via ld-lsb.so.2, which is a link to ld-linux.so.2 .
Again useful info - thanks - although I suspect it does no harm to include it.
At last I wonder why the script formulates libX11-common as a dependency. Formally spoken it is correct, but isn't that package not installed by default?
Probably

Wim
As I said in my post along with the script, I simply used the recommendations evolved by others in this thread, and brought them all together in the script to hopefully make installation easier for less experienced users. It can no doubt be improved, but I wonder if it is really worth the effort? It's very time consuming creating fresh installs on multiple D.E.s and arch's just to test one package.
Please feel free to hack it as you wish.
