by rodgoslin » Jun 20th, '17, 22:36
Hi, Peter, I wish I could agree with you, but I can't. I find Konqueror the best thing since sliced bread, and that's with years of experience with File Managers of all types. Dolphin I find is a sad and deficient substitute. I've been unable to find these options of which you refer, and if Dolphin has any bookmarking facilities, I've been unable to find them. Sadly, unless I can import the old and feature rich Konqueror into Mga6, I'm going to give it a miss. I shall probably put it onto one of my other machines for the stuff new to Mageia. Like Posterazor, which fulfils a long felt want (See one of my old posts).
Oddly, only today, The Register has come up with an article covering exactly this ('OK, everyone. Stop typing, this software is DONE,' said no one ever), which puts it all into a nutshell. For most of my working life, I've been a draughtsman, in Production Engineering, designing the tools with which things were made. Then my current employer decided to go into CAD, leasing Prime Medusa from Prime Computers, which ran on a Prime super-mini. It was a revelation. It was absolutely perfect, and I took to it like a duck to water. Later, when the UK decided that making money from making things was too hard, I moved into CAD admin. It was then, that the Medusa software people decided to 'improve' the software. The old system used a physical tablet and a 'puck' to select drawing elements and commands, and a 'joystick' to move a cursor around the screen. On the new, it was all onscreen, with the menu's reducing the screen area devoted to the drawing quite considerably. As a draughtsman, used to working on anything up to A0, it was like working through a keyhole. The software people were keen to point out all the 'new' features, but, as a draughtsman, I pointed out that it was quicker to use the old conventions than the new 'features'. The list goes on and on. The Psion C was another case, in point. It was perfect from the first day. The 'improvements' were generally less useful than the original. As the article in The Register pointed out the changes were to keep the software people employed, rather than the users getting a better interface.