maat wrote:By the way the borderline argument used by some people in favor of "ignoring legal threats" attitude is that patent owners, for example, mpeg-la, would not prosecute vlc like project owners because that would not bring them money but rather bad reputation... well : perhaps... but perhaps not... Who can say for sure ? (well it's also easier to ask others to expose themselves than decide to expose oneself )
All the question is that of deciding if we permit ourselves to expose people (our users) to legal risk (even if truly unlikely) without their knowing...
Hi Maat!
Many thanks for your detailed response.
I can appreciate that you are very concerned about this supposed problem, and to the extent that your colleagues agree with you, then, I can also appreciate WHY Mageia does not include VLC with the default distro.....
Two points I wish to make, in the spirit of completeness for this topic.
a. First, and most importantly, I believe, VLC is downloaded by folks, like me, who use windows 98, or XP, DAILY, in the hundreds of thousands, compared with the paucity of folks using Linux. NONE, not even one person, none of those folks, have ever been threatened by anyone, for using VLC. When you write about litigation against the tiny handful of linux users, you make me laugh. Even the most optimistic census puts linux users at less than 2% of all users of computers in USA. You mentioned attorneys at law. Surely then, you must realize that it costs a lot of money to prosecute someone for ostensibly violating a civil statute. Unless an attorney is independently wealthy, he/she certainly isn't going to undertake litigation, which would be of questionable outcome in the best circumstance, when the opponents (folks having downloaded Linux with VLC included) number in the hundreds, not millions.
b. Secondly, and this is not a major league repudiation of your ideas, but I mention it, in passing, as further attestation to the incorrectness of your ideas:
there are Linux distros which do work, with VLC enabled, "out of the box", i.e. immediately upon completing the installation from CDROM, having downloaded the distro, one simply clicks on the icon representing aac+, for example, or mp3, or OGG, and voila, music arrives.... Nothing to compile. Nothing to download, nothing to worry about. Effortless. None of this nonsense about "tainted" this or that. Maat, you make Mageia sound like it was engineered by folks who are not completely with the program, to be honest.....
I can furnish names if you wish, of such Linux distros, if it would aid the discussion of how Mageia is different from other distributions......
I read in another thread, that a guy was delighted with Mageia, for it installed in just FOUR hours. Holy Cow. What in the world was he using for a computer? An abacus? A 386 with 4 megabytes of RAM? FOUR hours???? He must be kidding....
It takes me 20 minutes to install CrunchBang on a ten year old machine, and that includes the time needed to assign autologin (VLC is already installed, automatically, no need for the user to do anything....)
Even windows 98, notoriously slow, because of the need to go out and download all kinds of obsolete browsers and old, brain dead editions of VLC,
takes only 60 minutes, on a machine with only half a gigabyte of memory and a slowpoke Celeron chugging along at 800 MHz....
How could anyone need four hours to install Mageia?
CAI ENG