doktor5000 wrote:Well, i'll vote against the new-tab thing
Now, who do you think will believe this?viking60 wrote:I have been a bad boy and I will never do it again I promise! I'll be good
Spoiler: | See? I have been good all the time and waited and waited and waited.... Good to see that the suggestions are finally implemented though. Those who do not like them do not have to use them - and all the others have now gotten more options. Has your status been lifted since you are able to do this now? Or have you simply been stubborn and mean for all this time Good show! |
viking60 wrote:Has your status been lifted since you are able to do this now?
Or have you simply been stubborn and mean for all this time
- can be easily changed by the users who want that.
viking60 wrote:- can be easily changed by the users who want that.
How?
Oh yes that old story. The majority wants a link to open in a new tab when clicked normally - that is a fact. The stubborn minority wants to middle click with somersaults while scratching their head with their toes. While making up fitting rules about majorities and how big they need to be. | All arguments are known - the community made an informed decision - and it is ignored. Mostly because the people in control of the server do not agree. No need to repeat all the argumentation again. In any case I guess you are in no position to do anything about it anyway - or do you have access to the files? |
Ken-Bergen wrote:BTW: This majority of yours sounds like five wolfs and two sheep voting on what/who to have for dinner.
Good morning. Will you pardon my two cents' worth?
That is not an official bar.viking60 wrote:Ken has set the minimum limit to 5% of 4000 which would be 200 people but he would prefer 50% of 4000 which would make 2000 people.
At least he has set a number that people can relate to -up front.
Return to Discussions about forums
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest