Page 1 of 3

Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: Apr 8th, '11, 08:17
by petrherynk
It would be good to add this package to repo Mageia. Thank.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: Apr 8th, '11, 10:50
by Sfiet_Konstantin
See this Bug

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: Apr 8th, '11, 12:23
by ennael
Still no reply for now unfortunatelly

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: Apr 8th, '11, 12:34
by Sfiet_Konstantin
In MDV there were packages (in PLF) of Google Earth that downloads the installer binary from google and install it in the system. Does Skype (and Adobe as well, for Flash) allows this kind of installation since Mga do not redistribute packages itself but uses Skype (or Adobe) distribution channels ?

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: Apr 8th, '11, 14:10
by ennael
I was working on such solution. Will upload it if nothing happens in coming days

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: Apr 8th, '11, 17:37
by Sfiet_Konstantin
Is the binaries from Skype (2.2) working on Mga ?
By working, I mean :
- Can instant message
- Can call a person
- Can make a video call with sb

The old one was not working : it don't allow me to connect and loops on "signing in" ...

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 9th, '11, 21:26
by pmithrandir
Hi

I'm looking for a rpm of skype 2.2.

The 2.1 version from MIB works fine, but when I try to install the 2.2, I got this error message :
erreur : échec du déballage de l'archive dans fichier /usr/bin/skype;4dc80adf: cpio: read echec - Mauvais descripteur de fichier

(sorry french error)

Any news from skype or any way to be compatible with fedora or open suse rpm ?

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 00:56
by Sfiet_Konstantin
I'm using fedora skype package (official) on 64 system.
It works well (except it steals the sound output for itself ...)
You shoud install it using
Code: Select all
cd thedirectorywhereisskypepackage
urpmi skypepackagename --nodeps

And download dependancies if needed after by executing skype and getting the missing shared libs.

EDIT : ennael, I think it is time to upload the package ... :oops:

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 12:01
by pmithrandir
Sfiet_Konstantin wrote:EDIT : ennael, I think it is time to upload the package ... :oops:


Hi

What does that mean ?
Are you going to put a package on non free as it's suggested in the bug report ?

Pierre

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 12:33
by Sfiet_Konstantin
pmithrandir wrote:Hi

What does that mean ?
Are you going to put a package on non free as it's suggested in the bug report ?

Pierre


I mean nothing really important, just saying that it is useless waiting eternally for their response.
BTW MS has bought Skype ... :o :? :roll:

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 16:14
by pmithrandir
Sorry, I thought it was "Edit by Ennael" and not a message to Ennael. My mistake.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 16:55
by charcler
Here you have a spec file to construct a 'neutral rpm for Skype' :
https://bugs.mageia.org/attachment.cgi?id=378

Neutral rpm ?
-> skype licence does not allow distribution of skype binary.
-> So, we don't provide it (rpm contains only a script, not skype binary, nor any skype's file)

install rpm :
-> it download the latest version of Skype, ever
-> it works egal for 32 and 64bits (use of dynamic version, and latest beta : 32b)
-> dependancies are solved into rpm
-> could be re-used when skype have an update available

This is not perfect, of course, but a simple and legal way, for all.
And .. it works ! (latest version of skype, on 32 and 64, on kde or gnome, with or without pulseaudio)

For those who not want wait for idea acceptance, spec corrections, and rpm availability, you could :
as root :
# urpmi rpmbuild

as user :
$ wget https://bugs.mageia.org/attachment.cgi?id=378
$ mv attachment.cgi?id=378 ~/rpm/SPECS/skype-installer.spec
$ cd ~/rpm/SPECS/
$ rpmbuild skype-installer.spec

Finally, as root, install rpm (in user home... rpm/RPMS/)

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 17:20
by isadora
And this all whilst Microsoft takes over Skype today.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 17:20
by charcler
isadora, i know : as you could see, a bugzilla reference to an attachement. In this bug, Kristoffer Grundström inform us about this acquisition.
thanks ? hello ?

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 17:35
by isadora
Exactly, and maybe time to search for alternatives?
As where it is for free PC to PC video and voice calls, and for integration of all your IM contacts, one could take a chance with QuteCom for example.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 17:40
by charcler
Personnally i dont use skype : I use Gtalk for long time ago, now.

For Skype, friends migration from skype to others, for many people : "can not be a snap", so rather than rushing to propose a better solution in the meantime.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 18:25
by pmithrandir
I think there is 2 way to see that news.

First : Microsoft is going to merge skype and MSN, so it's the end of skype for Linux.
Second : Microsoft is going to merge skype and msn, so it's the beginning of MSN on Linux.

I don't think Microsoft is going to stop the skype linux dev soon. And even if they do that, the last version should work for years before they can update all skype installation.
For the moment, I really like the idea of the dummy RPM. It seems to be a way to resolv the licence issue, and to have skype in the usual installation process.
How does that work if you uninstall it ? Can you ask the RPM to remove all files from a list, or are you limited to the skype installer ?

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 20:34
by charcler
pmithrandir wrote: Second : Microsoft is going to merge skype and msn, so it's the beginning of MSN on Linux.
it is bright !
i hope it is the begining of msn-skype on linux, too (even i dont use it, i thinks it is a good news).
pmithrandir wrote:I don't think Microsoft is going to stop the skype linux dev soon
because Android too...(not the same skype, but... who know ?)
pmithrandir wrote:And even if they do that, the last version should work for years before they can update all skype installation.
yes!
pmithrandir wrote:How does that work if you uninstall it ?
urpme skype-installer : clean the system : .desktop files (skype.dekstop and skype-installer.desktop) + the skype-installer script + the dir of skype itself. So, yes we could use urpme skype-installer to remove totally skype.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 21:41
by Sfiet_Konstantin
pmithrandir wrote:IFirst : Microsoft is going to merge skype and MSN, so it's the end of skype for Linux.
Second : Microsoft is going to merge skype and msn, so it's the beginning of MSN on Linux.


"Qui vivra verra"
(Wait and see in french)

Personally, I hate skype, but I have to use it ... I'm looking for a free alternative. GTalk was a good candidate, but I do not consider something coming from google to be open source ...
Any advices ?

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 21:48
by isadora
As i told just before, QuteCom is a nice alternative.
But not (yet) in the Mageia-repositories, as far as i know.
Installed it in Mandriva just an hour ago, and works well.
Only, it is NOT Skype, and you must create a (free) SIP-account.
There are some providers that can provide you such an account.
For example at IPTEL: http://serweb.iptel.org/user/reg/index.php


Submitted a request at Bugzilla:
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1234

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 10th, '11, 23:31
by charcler
In Java, another old solution (but non-libre) : Qnext.
Support of Linux / Mac / Windows / Android / Iphone.
Support for audio + video + files transfert + conferencing + photo sharing + media sharing + audio streaming + games (as Chess!) + multiusers conférence.
Support for SSL
Support for Qnext + msn + yahoo + facebook + IRC + google-talk + jabber + aol + icq
http://qnext.com

Qutcom is a revamp of an old 9Telecom excellent client. (which i used severals times, many years ago, with a "payme_support" account too : good service idea)
Is the new version is really usefull ? Not so easy, i see.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 11th, '11, 11:37
by juergen_harms
This article provides an excellent summary on situation and criteria for what is needed from a successor.

Would be interesting to come to some kind of consensus which criteria can be relaxed in order to focus on a satisfactory solution.

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 11th, '11, 11:59
by pmithrandir
Maybe you could use another post to think about an alternative to skype, it seems a little out of the subject here, isn't it ?

Except if microsoft refuse to develop a new version for Linux, I don't think people are going to use something else only for this reason. Who cares the owner if the service works fine. Microsoft is not the north corea government.

Is there any new from the team about the previsous idea ? If it's works fine and if there is no licence issues, we should put it in repositories asap shouldn't we ?

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 11th, '11, 15:44
by dubigrasu
Maybe you could use another post to think about an alternative to skype


I wanted to do exactly that, (Skype alternatives ?) but I couldn't figure out where to place such a topic :)

Re: Skype 2.2.

PostPosted: May 11th, '11, 16:20
by isadora
dubigrasu wrote:
Maybe you could use another post to think about an alternative to skype


I wanted to do exactly that, (Skype alternatives ?) but I couldn't figure out where to place such a topic :)

Best place would be: "Ideas and Suggestions".