What's happening with Bug 207

This forum is dedicated to testing early releases and cauldron : Howtos, tips, tricks and user global feedback and thoughts...

Helpful tip :
For bugs tracking we use : https://bugs.mageia.org = The Mageia Bug Tracker
In this bug tracker you'll find already reported bugs and you'll be able to report those you have found....

What's happening with Bug 207

Postby lionelv » Mar 9th, '13, 12:59

Hi,

I've just installed Mageia 3 beta 3 and I have exactly the problem described at https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207

I'm not sure exactly what the status of this is, last updated on 16th of January.
lionelv
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 12:57

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby oj » Mar 9th, '13, 16:19

Have you tried with the firewall disabled? Depending on how you're plugged into the internet, you probably don't need a firewall on individual machines.
oj
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Aug 23rd, '12, 00:22

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby lionelv » Mar 10th, '13, 05:48

Yeah, I went to check the firewall after reading the bug description and it was already turned off.
lionelv
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 12:57

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby lionelv » Mar 10th, '13, 14:01

Hmmm, that was really weird. Just happened to come back to the firewall because mysql was not working and I discovered that it was back on. Now NFS is finding the servers no problems. However, the bug still mentions that there was going to be a change so that firewall exceptions were added, I'm wondering if this is still going to happen.
lionelv
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 12:57

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby oj » Mar 10th, '13, 15:30

IMHO NFS requires such a range of ports you may as well have no firewall. I've always wondered why the default NFS config doesn't restrict the random port range to a much narrower range. That would be a question for the upstream developers, but I suspect the answer would be "we've always done it this way."
oj
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Aug 23rd, '12, 00:22

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby doktor5000 » Mar 10th, '13, 15:47

oj wrote:IMHO NFS requires such a range of ports you may as well have no firewall.

Basically NFS only uses two ports, 111 for rpc and 2049 for nfs. Additionally rpc.mountd uses a dynamical port, but that can also be changed.
Cauldron is not for the faint of heart!
Caution: Hot, bubbling magic inside. May explode or cook your kittens!
----
Disclaimer: Beware of allergic reactions in answer to unconstructive complaint-type posts
User avatar
doktor5000
 
Posts: 18042
Joined: Jun 4th, '11, 10:10
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby oj » Mar 10th, '13, 16:35

except the client calls on a random high port negotiated with the portmapper. I've seen rpc.lockd etc set to specific ports, but if they aren't, random outgoing (client side) ports are used. An example of a locked down config:

Code: Select all
LOCKD_TCPPORT=32803
LOCKD_UDPPORT=32769
MOUNTD_PORT=892
RQUOTAD_PORT=875
STATD_PORT=662
STATD_OUTGOING_PORT=2020


the bottom line is for nfs to work, a lot of ports (or a range) must be open. Looking at nfs configs in sysconfig I see Mageia limits a few services to 4000-4002. But generally the default setup in most distros does not clamp down on this port use.
oj
 
Posts: 232
Joined: Aug 23rd, '12, 00:22

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby lionelv » Mar 11th, '13, 00:59

Well I have a firewall on my router, only a very small number of ports get passed through so I think I'm safe?

Late last night I did get NFS working, but I had some big issues disabling the firewall in Mageia. I would click everything and exit and when I came back it would always be turned back on. When I went into the security section I discovered another firewall option and tried clicking everything there too, and once again if I would exit and come back it would be turned on. I don't seem to be able to disable my firewall!
lionelv
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 12:57

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby doktor5000 » Mar 11th, '13, 20:43

Can you please open a separate thread for that firewall issue? Golden rule: one problem per thread ;)
Cauldron is not for the faint of heart!
Caution: Hot, bubbling magic inside. May explode or cook your kittens!
----
Disclaimer: Beware of allergic reactions in answer to unconstructive complaint-type posts
User avatar
doktor5000
 
Posts: 18042
Joined: Jun 4th, '11, 10:10
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby lionelv » Mar 12th, '13, 00:17

I've actually opened a bug (9329) because the firewall isn't working for me at all. But is it a separate thread since the fire wall is what is blocking NFS!

But point taken, at this stage the bug is sufficient to submit the firewall issue.
lionelv
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 12:57

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby doktor5000 » Mar 12th, '13, 20:39

Ahh sorry, i thought that was about the bug with NFS and name resolution. So no, this doesn't need a new thread.
But from the last comments on the bug report, should already be fixed in latest cauldron packages, or they should come in the next few days.
Cauldron is not for the faint of heart!
Caution: Hot, bubbling magic inside. May explode or cook your kittens!
----
Disclaimer: Beware of allergic reactions in answer to unconstructive complaint-type posts
User avatar
doktor5000
 
Posts: 18042
Joined: Jun 4th, '11, 10:10
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: What's happening with Bug 207

Postby lionelv » Mar 13th, '13, 00:23

My system is working because I changed the script as described in the bug :). I just realised that I didn't say that I used the "Network installer + nonfree firmware CD". I don't know if it is important but I might add it.
lionelv
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Mar 9th, '13, 12:57


Return to Testing : Alpha, Beta, RC and Cauldron

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron