Creto wrote:Hello all,
In Brazilian Forum
http://forum.mageiabr.org/viewtopic.php ... =blogdrake there is a thread with a subject like that and sorry to say this but use the repository where the keepers have a corporate position, not open to debate suicide think the minimum for an end user.
Sorry but i don't understand this, our rules always have been clear, don't package nothing that already is in official repositories at less is new version and the official repositories don't provide it, don't package nothing related to the core of the distro (like kernel), don't package nothing that may conflict with the system.
As i can see the link talk about a petition made to blogdrake's packagers, the application is a package manager with their own repositories, even i think that is designed to an specific linux dsitro, and for last have a lot of package with potential of have conflicts with the official packages.
Off course we are not perfects and can made mistakes when rejected some package, but if you or other really believe that some must be packaged just open other tread in
packager's forum or ask for it in the mageia's bugzilla

Creto wrote:I say this because they happen to have a problem with some application installed for this repository they barely meet the topic and then the lock, the User has no opinion there, boring and dictator.
Sorry for the voracious sincerity, but that is what I think of this repository.
Sincerely,
Creto
T+
Problems with what repository? The repository of the aplication linked? or The blogdrake's repository?
If is the last you always can report the problem in the
packager's forum (even in english) and we try to fix as quick as can